About computer programming, operating systems, gaming, gadgets, electronics and life in general...
Thursday, December 18, 2008
The Netbook Marketing Miracle
Once again proof that you should never be too sure about what the market does is shown in this article Based on his experience and market research the author very clearly proves that computers like the current generation of Netbooks never were and never will be successful. The funny thing about this is that is was written Michael Mace, a former employee of Palm Computing. And the company that is publishing it (Rubicon) actually advertises to be an expert in marketing. Now I'm not saying this company is not good at their work. It's more proof of the fact that nobody ever can predict what sells and what not. The most frightening thing for marketeers should be the fact that the product this article refers to (the Palm Foleo) was introduced in 2007 and was considered a flop end cancelled even before it was was ever sold. Yet it's difficult to see the difference between this box and the ASUS EeePC 700 which was introduced only a few months later. And a year after that Netbooks are responsible for almost 30% in all computer sales. So I wonder what Palm CEO Ed Colligan thinks when he reads back his this announcement.
Labels:
eeepc,
Intermezzo,
netbook
Tuesday, November 18, 2008
Fun with shrinking URL services
Actually I was never even aware of the fact that there are services that allow you to abbreviate URLs. Until I stumbled upon them in Twitter. (Also a service I was not aware of, but that's a different story) Apart from the obvious 'Why Did I Not Think Of That' moment, the second thought that came to me is that it would be fun just to type in random combinations of letters, and see where it gets you.
So I started with rurl.org/aaa to find out what the best fishing spots are in Russia.
And I cannot read rurl.org/zzz , but somehow I think it has something to do with a jubileum.
Even funnier it is to use combinations that have a meaning, like my initials: rurl.org/caj which bring you a surprising technical paper by Scott Hanselman.
And of course rurl.org/sex , which does not bring you what you might expect...
(And if you want to know how it works, check out this article by Jeff Atwood)
Labels:
Intermezzo
Monday, November 03, 2008
Chair or no chair-man..
Not at all related to any of my blog entries, but just too funny to let it pass by unnoticed. This Chairman of the South African Finance Portfolio Committee proves that the national tv station indeed lacks the money for maintaining it's furniture.
Labels:
Intermezzo
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Would you trust anyone with your passwords ?
For a while I've been using the Foxmarks Firefox extension. It's an excellent way to keep all your bookmarks in sync on every PC, even on my EeePC with Firofox under Linux. Once installed you can almost forget about it and it just does what it has to do in the background. Great. And then recently there was an automatic upgrade that asked me the following question : 'Do you want to use the Password Sync feature ?'
So I could synchronize my 100+ passwords on all my PC's too ? Great, I thought for a few seconds. Until I realized that this would imply that everytime I log on all my passwords are send to a central server. To a place I have no idea where it is. Controlled by a company I almost know nothing about. The 'About Us' shows some reliable names, including the famous Mitch Kapor, who's known to have so much money that he really couldn't care less about my ample savings on a foreign Iceland bank account. But what about the others ?
Of course Foxmarks says the passwords are safely encrypted. True. But how can I check that ? Well, I could probably check that using some network-spy software and a lot of hard work. But even if I were a hardcore hacker I would do this only a once or twice. Certainly not every time I use the service (then I would be better off by writing all my passwords on the back of my hand every day..).
And a year from now I probably don't even realize that I'm still using this feature. and the plug-in is updated automatically. So if for example a year from now update 30.134 is installed, and by accident this plug-in 'forgets' to encrypt the passwords ? Or it uses some type of encryption that is easy to decode by the Foxmarks programmers. Who may not be the same trustworthy team that founded the company in the first place as Foxmarks by then could have been purchased by a Nigerian Investment Company.
Labels:
Browser,
Intermezzo
Friday, October 17, 2008
Silicone spray or Mortgages, both can kill the system
I'm not even sure Joel Spolsky thought of it when he wrote this article about the way commission based sales systems eventually always seem to backfire at the company, but the current financial crises is certainly the the biggest proof that this works on any scale...
Labels:
Intermezzo
Thursday, September 04, 2008
Speed up with Chrome
There is much buzz around the new Google Chrome browser. I suppose most of you have (like me) downloaded it, played around with it and then continued to use Firefox for everyday use. After all, the shiny clean look is impressive at first and the page preview look is fun, but the lack of (visible) UI elements and the fact you have to do without all your usefull plugins like Adblock, Foxmarks ,FireBug and Webdeveloper soon makes you return to Firefox.
And this is intentional. Chrome is not (yet) for everyday browsing. It's created as a platform for web-based apps. The importance of chrome is mainly in what you see in the image below.
These are the results of the V8 Javascript benchmark. The higher the score, the better. So yes, the Javascript V8 engine as used in Chrome performs roughly 30 times better than the engine in IE6. And this is really important these days, since Javascript is the engine that powers all these popular AJAX based web applications like Basecamp, Google docs, Flickr or Twitter. So, as predicted by Jeff Atwood in his article about Javascript, the speed of Javascript is going to be more important. And when you believe (as Google does) that the future of computing is in the browser, Chrome is the logical platform. What really surprised me though is that it lacks a 'full screen' function. After all that is what you'd really expect from a browser that is supposed to replace your desktop ?
And yet you still cannot launch any browser without having an operating system. And right now Chrome only runs on Windows...
And this is intentional. Chrome is not (yet) for everyday browsing. It's created as a platform for web-based apps. The importance of chrome is mainly in what you see in the image below.
These are the results of the V8 Javascript benchmark. The higher the score, the better. So yes, the Javascript V8 engine as used in Chrome performs roughly 30 times better than the engine in IE6. And this is really important these days, since Javascript is the engine that powers all these popular AJAX based web applications like Basecamp, Google docs, Flickr or Twitter. So, as predicted by Jeff Atwood in his article about Javascript, the speed of Javascript is going to be more important. And when you believe (as Google does) that the future of computing is in the browser, Chrome is the logical platform. What really surprised me though is that it lacks a 'full screen' function. After all that is what you'd really expect from a browser that is supposed to replace your desktop ?
And yet you still cannot launch any browser without having an operating system. And right now Chrome only runs on Windows...
Labels:
Browser,
Javascript
Friday, August 22, 2008
Dreaming on: Chandler 1.0 released
You might not have noticed, but on August 8th, 2008 at 1:47 pm, Chandler, the ' "Note-to-Self Organizer", designed for personal and small-group task management and calendaring' finally came to release 1.0 ! Now Chandler is an Open Source project, and 80% of these projects probably never reaches this stage at all, but Chandler is a special case. It is created by the Open Source Application Foundation which was founded and and is sponsored by Mitch Kapor. The Chandler project is a unique example of where a project that has no deadline and an unlimited funding can lead to: unlimited development.
And no matter what finally comes out of it, the first three years of the project already gave us the magnificent novel by Scot Rosenberg : Dreaming in Code. A great book that may well outlive the software itself. It describes the development process from the initial idea upto version 0.7. Three years have passed then and Rosenberg realises he just has to draw the line himself and publish the book before the project is finished. And he was right. The book was written by the end of 2005 and so it has taken roughly two and a half years before they they finally came to version 1.0 . I'm glad he didn't wait for that, since by now I already read the book twice. I really recommend it to any developer, manager or just anybody using software (Yep, that's you by default, or you would not be reading this..).
Apart from it being really fun to read, it's description of ever shifting deadlines, continuously changing specifications and numerous code re-writes is so recognizable to me as a developer. Just check out Joel Spolsky's review to see what I mean.
And what about the software itself ? Well, I haven't tried it yet but the concept is great, though not as revolutionary as it might has seemed in 2002. As already mentioned in the book, 37Signals already provides most of the functionality as a web application. With all the benefits: no server maintenance, available everywhere through every browser and automatic upgrades.
But the Outlook / Exchange combination is still used in many corporate environments. And since Chandler is aimed at replacing that, they might still have a chance.
And no matter what finally comes out of it, the first three years of the project already gave us the magnificent novel by Scot Rosenberg : Dreaming in Code. A great book that may well outlive the software itself. It describes the development process from the initial idea upto version 0.7. Three years have passed then and Rosenberg realises he just has to draw the line himself and publish the book before the project is finished. And he was right. The book was written by the end of 2005 and so it has taken roughly two and a half years before they they finally came to version 1.0 . I'm glad he didn't wait for that, since by now I already read the book twice. I really recommend it to any developer, manager or just anybody using software (Yep, that's you by default, or you would not be reading this..).
Apart from it being really fun to read, it's description of ever shifting deadlines, continuously changing specifications and numerous code re-writes is so recognizable to me as a developer. Just check out Joel Spolsky's review to see what I mean.
And what about the software itself ? Well, I haven't tried it yet but the concept is great, though not as revolutionary as it might has seemed in 2002. As already mentioned in the book, 37Signals already provides most of the functionality as a web application. With all the benefits: no server maintenance, available everywhere through every browser and automatic upgrades.
But the Outlook / Exchange combination is still used in many corporate environments. And since Chandler is aimed at replacing that, they might still have a chance.
Labels:
Books,
Programming
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Easy C
After reading this 'Daily WTF' I first laughed, but then I suddenly noticed the this particular line:
/* arithmetic operators */
#define MOD %
.. when I realised this actually solves one of my little annoyances that I had for as long as I program in C or C# : I never remember the 'modulo' operator !
Since it's not something you need everyday I always end up looking at some kind of standard C manual to find out what it was. And nine out of ten times I first hit a compilation error because I use the (non existent) mod(x) function. I think this has to do with the fact that the '%' sign is not in any way related to a 'real' mathematical operator like +, -, / or * . Probably the C language developers just felt that the modulo operation should be a keyword, and the % was the last unused character on the keyboard.
And what about the '==' versus '=' mistake, often marked as the most frequently made mistake in C programming ? Using just ' #define EQUALS == ' would really eliminate this type of error. So maybe there is something to say for this 'Better C'. If it helps you in writing programs faster because you it makes things look more natural to you, then why not do it like this ?
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Serial communication on the EeePC
And for the EeePC the answer is yes.
[Inline Rant]
(Don't ask me why almost everything on Linux requires typing 5 to 10 letter acronyms for tasks you never even knew existed.. [growisofs, nifd, mozplugger, fstab-sync ??? And these are just a few of the most popular commands.])
[Inline Rant End]
So I moved to Cutecom, and this works fine.
EeePC is here !
It's obviously the most desirable gadget of the moment. The ASUS EeePC with it's 7" screen, small but complete keyboard and it's beautiful 'Pearl-Shine' white finish. And it's also a real computer. 900Mhz Intel Celeron, 512 MB RAM, 2 Gigabyte flash hard disk, WLAN, Ethernet, VGA output and 3 USB connections make this little box a full fledged PC with capabilities one could only dream of a few years ago. It comes with a Linux OS, and it boots in something like TWENTY seconds. It has many pre-installed apps, like the complete OpenOffice suite, FireFox and Thunderbird, so 90 to 100% of your daily work is covered. And that's what it's for. I think if you buy it as a'multi purpose' desktop PC replacement and expect to work exactly like your WindowsXP machine you're missing the point (and you get rants like "I hate my EeePC"). Nobody complains about his multi media phone not being able to run OpenOffice. That's not what it was designed for.
On the other hand, if you are a geek like me and are tempted by the possibilities of this platform then there is plenty of room for experimenting. But I'll keep the original setup intact because that's really ideal if you want to get some work done in confined spaces like an airplane chair on a low cost flight..
Labels:
eeepc
Monday, May 26, 2008
Too hard, or a challenge ?
Quote:
'it's a fun programming exercise that you're doing because it's just hard enough to be interesting but not so hard that you can't figure it out.'
Never thought of it that way, but this is indeed the kind of project I like to do most. And if most programmers are like me they will always tend to bend a projects towards this edge. If it's too simple we'll add functionality that creates new challenges. And if it seems just to hard we try to figure a way around it (buying a third party library or let someone else do it..) so we can spend more time at the things we like, like the slow fading in and out of our super-fancy splash-screen...
'it's a fun programming exercise that you're doing because it's just hard enough to be interesting but not so hard that you can't figure it out.'
Never thought of it that way, but this is indeed the kind of project I like to do most. And if most programmers are like me they will always tend to bend a projects towards this edge. If it's too simple we'll add functionality that creates new challenges. And if it seems just to hard we try to figure a way around it (buying a third party library or let someone else do it..) so we can spend more time at the things we like, like the slow fading in and out of our super-fancy splash-screen...
Labels:
Programming
Friday, April 25, 2008
Arcade Games
So I'm not the only one. I already tried to explain in one of my previous posts how I felt about Arcade gaming, but if you read Jeff Atwoods blog about the subject you know exactly. I could not have said it better.I think the only difference between me and Jeff is that he needed a car to get to the arcade, and I could go by bike...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)